Abstract Possible: The Trailer
11 November 2010 – 16 January 2011
Artists:
Doug Ashford, Claire Barclay,
Goldin+Senneby, Wade Guyton,
Mai-Thu Perret
Opening:
Wednesday November 10, 5-9 p.m.
Press preview:
Wednesday November 10 at 11 a.m.
C-salen
S:t Johannesgatan 7
Box 17127
200 10 Malmö
www.konsthall.malmo.se
Clandestine, opaque, hermetic and abstract are all buzzwords frequently used in discussions of contemporary art over the last decade. A plethora of examples of formal abstraction, both geometric and expressive, is visible in exhibitions, site-specific installations, publications, and other projects. In addition to the many cases where geometric abstraction in art and design becomes a lifestyle indicator, artists contemplate and engage with the legacy of modernist abstraction as the result of highly specific artistic and ideological trajectories. But what does it mean to revisit these trajectories from the point of view of today? The concept of abstraction has also—within a Marxist framework—been applied to all relations within a capitalist system. As of late, this has been extended to the logic and distortion of scale engendered by the post-Fordist/late capitalist economy. Working conditions, and conditions of production, are other pertinent points of reference here. All this is happening within a culture and an economy in which we literally “live under abstraction,” although the economic recession has more recently called such abstraction into relief. Or as the art critic and theoretician Sven Lütticken recently put it “We are the natives of abstraction.” In that case we have to acknowledge abstraction as omnipresent, not unlike the ideal of transparency in liberal democracies. What is the potential of abstraction in such a contested territory?
At the same time it is easy to observe yet another manifestation of abstraction, namely the use of strategies of withdrawal (abstrahere, to withdraw) among artists and other cultural producers. It is abstraction as conscious methods of obscuring and entering this formal terrain “at an angle”, often with the aim of creating more space for maneouvering through self-organised initiatives. These developments have been discussed in terms of “strategic essentialism” as well as “strategic separatism”. Sometimes it seems to be a reaction to pressures of spectacularization and access, at other times it seems to draw on specific art historical developments. Perhaps we can begin to think of these abstract/opaque strategies and tactics as a different critical paradigm challenging the enlightenment paradigm based on transparency? Or is it yet another phenomenon obscuring our view of the world? Each stage, or station, of Abstract Possible will be different with unique “sub-projects” which can be manifested as group shows, solo presentations, seminars, workshops, screenings, etc., depending on the nature of the location and the collaborations.
Further manifestations of Abstract Possible will take place at the Museo Tamayo in Mexico City (26 March – 14 August 2011), the exhibition space of the Postgraduate Program in Curating, Zurich University of Fine Arts (13 May – 3 June 2011) etc.
Curator: Maria Lind
Thanks to: Biograf Spegeln & the Swiss Arts Council Pro Helvetia
