April 19, 2017 - Latvian Pavilion at the Venice Biennale - Miķelis Fišers: What Can Go Wrong
April 19, 2017

Latvian Pavilion at the Venice Biennale

Miķelis Fišers, Reptilian Immobilizes Hallucinating Darwinists, 2017. Light and sound installation, extruded polystyrene, structured polypropylene sheets, drawing cut in ORACAL adhesive film, LED light tape, sound by ERROR, 600 x 600 x 600 cm. Photo: Ansis Starks. © Miķelis Fišers.


Miķelis Fišers
What Can Go Wrong
May 13–November 26, 2017

Preview: May 10–12
Opening: May 11, 5pm

Latvian Pavilion at the Venice Biennale
30122 Venice


Curator: Inga Šteimane
Commissioner: Daiga Rudzāte
Organization: Culture project agency INDIE with the support of Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Latvia and ABLV Charitable Foundation

The Republic of Latvia announces its participation at the 57th Venice Biennale with solo exhibition What Can Go Wrong by Latvian artist Miķelis Fišers, curated by Inga Šteimane.

The title What Can Go Wrong can be interpreted in various ways—surprise, question, or history. This ambiguity highlights an issue that concerns contemporary projects: how do we talk about our time? In what language? Miķelis Fišers chooses the language full of unscientific substances. Of all bodies of knowledge, he chooses knowledge without status. As Barthes writes, science (knowledge) is not defined by content or morality today; science is what is taught. Contemporary art has its own scientificity, which helps differentiate it from something else. In terms of Fišers’ art, it generally doesn’t help. Fišers is convinced that life is squandered and uses esoteric master signifiers to show it.

The contemporary artist chooses esoteric deviation. What has led to this acratic milestone, to this “'Enlightenment’s polemical Other' with its ‘magic,’ ‘occult philosophy,’ ‘the irrational,’ or even simply ‘stupidity’” (Hanegraaff), to which the Latvian Pavilion also contributes?

At the bottom of it all (that everything needs to change), Miķelis Fišers' art reminds us of Vassily Kandinsky’s confidence, when he wrote about “Letzte Stunde der geistigen Wendung” a hundred years ago. Kandinsky abandoned narrative and created abstraction, which, in his view, reflected the transition from old materialism to new spirituality. Fišers, by contemplating the new age, offers horrific figurative dystopias and in his academic years (the 90ies) already knew that his work would be "literature" rather than "formal art." The comparison is urged by the fact that such different works (Viva Arte Viva) were incurred from a similar theosophical basis about the transition to a new era, used by both artists—this transition has already stretched out over a century, so Kandinsky and Fišers are talking about the same thing!

One of the most interesting aspects of Fišers’ work is to detect, how an artist-made myth enters historical conditions. It is achieved with detailed drawings, accurate portrayals of psychological reactions and by using verbs in titles (i.e. by linking the language to the making of things): if reptilians treat sterilized Mermaids’ depression or aliens convert a concert into a public washroom, then the myth is not possible, because everyone is occupied with production and politics. Watching this hustle and bustle, there are countless “whys," until finally you realize that you have experienced irresponsible policies, alienated functionalism, a raging ego and a complete unwillingness to live in such a world. Esoteric deviation is a way to talk about the political.

Fišers' art is the ideal opposite to the status quo of contemporary art, as defined by artist Paul Chan: “Objective forces manifest in art today as subjective acts without an actual subjectivity, to express the power of inhumanity to define what is most human.” Fišers purposefully uses the power of the art itself—it's being different from politics, philosophy, religion, science and esotericism, but trying to be in a conditional spatial point where the individual details of constructed fields lose their distinctions through their sharp edges. Striving to define its historical difference from art that was created before it, contemporary art has become careless in relation to the rest of the world. It’s starting to liken to everything else. Miķelis Fišers has taken this into consideration. He relies on and uses the distinctiveness of art in the traditional manner—intuitively creating images that express the essence, though to be fair, not without conceptual stylization.

The catalogue of the Latvian Pavilion features the exposition What Can Go Wrong with wood-carvings, painting and light and sound installation by Miķelis Fišers. It presents essays about esoteric narratives in Latvian and Estonian contemporary art by Inga Šteimane and Margus Tamm, and an essay devoted to Miķelis Fišers' attempt to create the right situation of consciousness in his viewers’ minds by Ilmārs Šlāpins.

Press contact
Marta Krivade: marta.krivade [​at​] gmail.com / T +371 26486312

Latvian Pavilion at the Venice Biennale
Share - Miķelis Fišers
What Can Go Wrong
  • Share
Click to subscribe to e-flux and be the first to receive the latest news on international exhibitions and all e-flux related announcements
Subscribe to e-flux
Be the first to receive the latest news on international exhibitions and all e-flux related announcements.
Subscribe to architecture
Explore the most recent content from e-flux architecture and urbanism
Subscribe to e-flux programs
Keep up-to-date on all upcoming talks, screenings, and exhibitions at e-flux in New York