Framing Renovation - Nicole Kalms - Undoing Inclusion

Undoing Inclusion

Nicole Kalms

Arc_Ren_NK_00

Swing Time, Boston, USA by Höweler + Yoon Architecture. Source: Monash University XYX Lab (Isabella Webb).

Framing Renovation
May 2024










Notes
1

Nicole Kalms, She City: Designing out women’s inequity in cities (London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2023), 120.

2

Clara Greed, “Making the Divided City Whole: Mainstreaming Gender into Planning in the United Kingdom,” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 97, no. 3 (2006), 270.

3

Jane Rendell, Iain Borden, and Barbara Penner, Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction, Architext (London; New York: E & FN Spon, 2000), 7.

4

Clara Greed, Women and Planning: Creating Gendered Realities (London; New York: Routledge, 1994); Clara Greed, “Overcoming the Factors Inhibiting the Mainstreaming of Gender into Spatial Planning Policy in the United Kingdom,” Urban Studies 42, no. 4 (2005): 719–749, 735.

5

Caroline Criado Perez, Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men (London: Penguin Random House, 2019), xiii.

6

Mary Daly, “Gender Mainstreaming in Theory and Practice,” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, and Society 12, no. 3 (2005): 433–450.

7

Rosalind Gill, “Post-postfeminism? New Feminist Visibilities in Postfeminist Times,” Feminist Media Studies 16, no. 4 (2016): 610–630, 613.

8

The debates and discussions around definitions of woman are outside the scope of this paper. Women are not a homogenous group and differ in terms of their race, cultural background, socioeconomic status, sexuality, (dis)ability, age, and where they live, among other factors. Work in communities is about gender-diverse people too. The author encourages communities to work with a wide range of women and across the breadth of gender in their communities.

9

Sandra Huning, Barbara Zibell, Doris Damyanovic, and Ulrike Sturm, eds., Gendered approaches to spatial development in Europe: Perspectives, similarities, differences (London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2019), 1.

10

United Nations, “Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” (2015), .

11

“Safety,” in OECD Better Life Index, 2020. See .

12

Kalms, She City, 119.

13

Hoa Yang, Jess Berry, and Nicole Kalms, “Perceptions of Safety in Cities After Dark,” 83–104, in Lighting Design in Shared Public Spaces, ed. Shanti Sumartojo (Milton: Taylor and Francis, 2022).

14

“Make Space for Girls,” 2022. See .

15

XYX Lab and CrowdSpot, “YourGround Victoria Report” (Melbourne: Monash University XYX Lab, 2021), 108–111. See .

16

L. Van Hecke, et al., “Public open space characteristics influencing adolescents' use and physical activity: A systematic literature review of qualitative and quantitative studies,” Health Place 51 (May 2018): 158-173.

17

Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris and A. Sideris, "What brings children to the park? Analysis and measurement of the variables affecting children's use of parks,” Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (2010), 89–107.

18

Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris and Camille Fink, “Addressing Women's Fear of Victimization in Transportation Settings: A Survey of US Transit Agencies,” Urban Affairs Review 44, no. 4 (2009): 555; Gill Matthewson and Nicole Kalms, “Unwanted Sexual Behaviour and Public Transport: The Imperative for Gender-Sensitive Co-design”, 59, in Advancing a Design Approach to Enriching Public Mobility, eds. Selby Coxon and Robbie Natter (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021).