See →.
See →.
Sandra Harding compares Newton’s mechanics to a “rape-manual” in The Science Question in Feminism (Cornell University Press, 1986), 113.
Jennifer A. González, Subject to Display: Reframing Race in Contemporary Installation Art (MIT Press, 2008).
For an influential version of this account, see Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, “Introducing the New Materialisms,” in New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, ed. Diana Coole and Samantha Frost (Duke University Press, 2010).
This narrative of postmodernism’s failure has been extensively documented (and critiqued). For the “shift from epistemology to ontology” as a shared commitment across new materialisms, see Christopher N. Gamble, Joshua S. Hanan, and Thomas Nail, “What Is New Materialism?” Angelaki 24, no. 6 (2019). Jonathan Basile identifies “a generational shift … in continental science studies” from questioning scientific authority to a “‘materialism’ that enshrines it” in “The Epic of Genesis: Catherine Malabou and the Gêne of Epigenetics,” Derrida Today 16, no. 2 (2023): 106. For critiques of this narrative’s founding gesture and its systematic mischaracterization of poststructuralism, see Sara Ahmed, “Open Forum Imaginary Prohibitions: Some Preliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the ‘New Materialism,’” European Journal of Women’s Studies 15, no. 1 (2008). As Daniel-Pascal Zorn observes, postmodernism functions as a uniquely convenient adversary: “Die ‘Postmoderne’ ist der Gegner, auf den sich alle einigen können,” in Die Krise des Absoluten (Klett-Cotta, 2022), 11.
Günseli Yalcinkaya, “How Art Went Quantum,” Art Review, March 4, 2025 →.
“Introduction to Laure Prouvost: WE FELT A STAR DYING,” posted April 24, 2025, by LAS Art Foundation, YouTube →.
See →.
“Introduction to Laure Prouvost: WE FELT A STAR DYING.”
In addition to Harding cited above, see Donna Haraway, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Feminist Studies 14, no. 3 (1988).
See →.
Emily May, “Will Quantum Computing Change Art?” Frieze, February 25, 2025 →.
Bettina Kames, “A Quantum Era Is Coming. What Does This Mean for Art?” Art Newspaper, February 21, 2025 →.
Tom Gunning. “The Cinema of Attraction(s): Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde,” Wide Angle 8, no. 3–4 (1986).
Karen Barad, “On Touching: The Inhuman That Therefore I Am (v1.1),” Differences 23, no. 3 (2012): 207.
Karen Barad, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Duke University Press, 2007), 92.
Karen Barad and Daniela Gandorfer, “Political Desirings: Yearnings for Mattering (,) Differently,” Theory & Event 24, no. 1 (2021): 52.
Barad, “On Touching,” 223.
Barad and Gandorfer, “Political Desirings,” 19.
Craig Callender, “Can We Quarantine the Quantum Blight?” in Scientific Realism and the Quantum, ed. Steven French and Juha Saatsi (Oxford University Press, 2020), 72.
Jan Faye and Rasmus Jaksland, “Barad, Bohr, and Quantum Mechanics,” Synthese, no. 199 (2021).
See →.
Rasheedah Phillips, “Constructing a Theory and Practice of Black Quantum Futurism, Part One,” in Black Quantum Futurism: Theory & Practice, vol. 1, ed. Rasheedah Phillips (Afrofuturist Affair / House of Future Sciences Books, 2015), 11.
Phillips, “Constructing a Theory and Practice,” 23, 12, 16.
Phillips, “Constructing a Theory and Practice,” 15.
See Angela Willey, “Engendering New Materializations: Feminism, Nature, and the Challenge to Disciplinary Proper Objects,” in The New Politics of Materialism: History, Philosophy, Science, ed. Sarah Ellenzweig and John H. Zammito (Routledge, 2017).
