Even when I was publishing articles and lecturing on the radical ideas of immortalism and space travel during the early days of the Revolution, I was distilling them to a few affirmations that, although far from complete, constituted a fairly satisfactory definition of our credo. It seemed particularly important to create an awareness of our ideas in their most basic form, as close as possible in format to slogans, to express our scientific or philosophical ideas in a nutshell and answer a genuine need.
The most important thing for us is the immortality of the individual and its life in the cosmos. We have elevated this value to a goal in itself, thus formulating our teleological point of view. Our philosophy is first and foremost a great teleology and all philosophical problems are shaped by our glorious objectives.
We looked to our undying instinct for immortality and our unquenchable thirst for glorious creativity, trusting in our biocosmic consciousness of the objective world’s reality. Objective reality is an infinite arena for the great struggle in which everything that possesses individuality and integrity asserts its supreme existence.
Our ethical stance is an ethics of action understood in terms of the realization of the great objectives of biocosmism. Our ethical norms are defined by our ultimate goal (in this respect, we take an opposite view to Kant’s, for whom values and objectives stem from ethical norms). Our ethics are supported by our cosmology so that, were our world to be harmoniously complete and prepared, there would be no room for our individual actions or, indeed, those of others.
I have based the most important statements of our ideas concerning biocosmism on the philosophical premises presented here as concisely and clearly as possible, condensing them into the following clauses:
1. Death reduces man and debases the human character: fear for one’s life gives rise to timidity, baseness, falsity, and distortion. Death is also responsible for the deepening root of social injustice, monstrous private ownership, and the antagonism between individuals, nationalities, and classes. This restriction in time—death, that is—represents the age-old foundation for the spiritual and material collapse of both the individual and society.
2. But, man has within him an instinct for immortality, at once powerful and undying, and can never, therefore, be reconciled with the order of death. Death is so logically senseless, ethically inadmissible, and aesthetically ugly that the question of immortality inevitably rears its head in a person’s consciousness. In his inability to face death, man has looked for salvation in religion and mysticism in the hope of immortality, if only for the soul.
3. At a time when religion has finally become obsolete, when a religious and mystical solution to the question of immortality is no longer bound up with our daily bread, and death’s stronghold has been shaken biologically, mankind has, at last, come close to solving the realization of individual immortality as the immortality of the individual in the fullness of its physical and spiritual powers.
4. In biocosmism, every individual—and indeed mankind as a whole—will find complete freedom only in the struggle for individual immortality. Biocosmism maintains that this struggle represents the true basis for the spiritual and material union of the people, that the individual and society will grow to unprecedented heights in terms of strength and creativity, and that, through its involvement in this struggle, there will be unparalleled advances in the human character.
5. Note that in biocosmism the question of personal immortality, or immortalism, is also regarded as a question of resurrection. Resurrection is, above all, a logical conclusion to personal immortality and a guarantee against the chance death—avoidable in principle—of a person already assured of personal immortality. The question of resurrection is therefore also a question of new life among those who have lived before.
6. The question of interplanetarianism is raised in biocosmism at the same time as immortalism. If death (a restriction in time) is the primary root of evil in the life of the individual and society, then its secondary root is caused by a restriction in space, which is to say, the primary position accorded by one’s home, hometown, native land or state, and race. At the end of the day, even internationalism could be construed merely as a limitation in terms of the universe.
7. Mankind has already come up against the question of interplanetarianism, since an era of space travel will immediately follow an era of air travel. Interplanetarianism involves the problem of how to master cosmic space, how to become a citizen of the cosmos and an active participant in life in space, regulating and transforming the cosmic bodies at will through our wisdom, reshaping the old and creating new worlds.
8. The questions of immortalism and interplanetarianism must not be viewed independently or linked automatically. They both result from and complete one another, constituting a single organic whole united under a single term—biocosmism.
9. Even if there is an element of fantasy to biocosmism, this fantasy of ours should not be relegated entirely to the realms of utopia. Since it depends on the latest advances in science and technology, the fantasy of biocosmism has matured sufficiently for the questions of immortalism and interplanetarianism to become the “order of the day.” We contend that biocosmism is the new supreme life-plan for the single individual as well as mankind as a whole, and that it is now time to set about realizing this plan.
10. Our belief that the time has now come for us to present the questions associated with biocosmism as life’s most important objectives is based on our opinion that a world struggle between the oppressed and their oppressors and between labor and capital is now unfolding before us. This struggle seeks to destroy class divisions; in our view, this is a necessary prerequisite to the organizing of universal questions associated with biocosmism. The Revolution will undoubtedly embrace biocosmism, so that defining, collecting, and organizing the tendencies embodied within it will become the most important task of the revolutionaries. With the Revolution under way, an outline of the questions pertinent to biocosmism, the highest possible plan, is essential in order to bring victory to those in revolt. If we do not hesitate to implement the ideas of biocosmism today, before the Revolution is complete, the tenor of the Revolution will be forever altered.
11. In the struggle for biocosmism, it would be unthinkable either to imitate or concur with a religious or mystical order of things. Instead of immortality beyond the grave and immortality in the soul, our goal is to promote immortality here on Earth, in the real universe, the immortality of the individual, with all its spiritual and physical powers. Our relationship with religion and mysticism is, therefore, irredeemably negative. In the same way, instead of a dreamy, poetic, imaginative penetration of the universe, we favor a realistic interpretation of space travel as the immediate task of technology.
12. In the struggle for biocosmism, we are reliant on the latest scientific and technological achievements, striving to transform them at the same time as philosophy, sociology, economics, and art, etc., in keeping with our teleological notions; that is to say, their form and content must be formed to accord with the glorious objectives of biocosmism. This is why biocosmism represents the beginning of a completely new culture, a new order of things, and a new objective reality.
These twelve clauses make up the “Sacred Tenets of Biocosmism.” They comprise the ideological core from which our burgeoning creativity, propaganda, and struggle springs and continues to spread. We bring to the world the greatest gospel of them all; until now, it was hard to realize the unprecedented immensity of a movement that we, the biocosmists, are initiating in Russia, at the center of the Great Revolution.
Up until this point, mankind has resembled the people of ancient philosophy, who lived in a cave where they saw only the shadows of things. But today, thanks to the biocosmic avant-garde, mankind more strongly resembles those figures at the moment when they emerged from the cave, looking at real things lit up by the light of the Sun, even choosing to look at the Sun itself. We are sure that, in the very near future if not immediately, men will perceive themselves and the world through our lens and happily walk beneath our biocosmic banner.
Of course, in our movement, mistakes are possible, and death probably awaits us, as its first messengers and warriors. But even the prospect of serious mistakes and failures does not trouble us, in the same way that the danger of protracted defeat does not trouble the determined conqueror. He who has great goals before him, who is completely sure of himself, strong and absolutely firm in his resolve, ultimately always emerges victorious.
“Our Affirmations” was first published in Biocosmist (Биокосмист) no. 1 (March 1, 1922), the magazine of the Russian and Moscow Anarchists-Biocosmists.
×
The Social Commons: Citizens in the Shade, Aliens in the Sun
What whispered confidences and secrets may citizen and alien trade as they make their moves? What new things may be afoot in their wake? In 1762, when Jean-Jacques Rousseau added a conditional “but” after the phrase “man is born free” in The Social Contract, was he implying that there could be hidden costs to birth in the human species?
Cuba: The Fading of a Subcontinental Dream
As the revolution and its leaders enter their twilight years, what are the most relevant expressions of transition? How are the relations between the state and culture being reconfigured? Will the polemical and politically volatile divide between culture deemed to be inside or outside the revolution give way to more heterogeneous panorama?
Closing Editorial
A Knot Untied in Two Parts
Notes on the Abstract Strike
The Corruption of the Eye: On Photogenesis and Self-Growing Images
The Vectoralist Class
Mercury Retrograde
Surface Encounters
Soaking in the Daily Curses: A Conversation
Made to Fit, or The Gathering of the Balloons
Uncommoning Nature
Self-Identity is a Bad Visual System
Of Work Riots, Political Prisoners, and Workers Refusing to Leave the Factory—Translated Through the Pages of Faridabad Workers News (2005–2015)
Laboring One to Seven (Island of Terror)
Eating Glass: The New Propaganda
The Extraordinary Adventures of Guy Fawkes
Sharing Instinct: An Annotation of the Social Contract Through Shadow Libraries
Reading Art as Confrontation
Blackout City
A Few Notes from an Extellectual
Traitors, a Mutable Lexicon
It Takes so Much for a City to Happen
Less World to be Ourselves: A Note on Postapocalyptic Simplification
Give Back to Your Alma Mater!
Our Affirmations
The Revolution Is Dead—But Long Lives the State!
Extinction as Usual?: Geo-Social Futures and Left Optimism
Heart of Brightness
Supercritical Decay
THE COMMUNIST REVOLUTION WAS CAUSED BY THE SUN: A PARTIAL SCRIPT FOR A SHORT FILM
TBH IDK FTW
You Can’t Ask Everyone to Behave Ethically Just Like That
The Arts for the Global Conflict: A 2115 Report
The Alchemic Digital, The Planetary Elemental
Castroneirics: A Dreamitaph for Fidel (The Exquisite Cadaver)
The Memory of a Deluge and the Surface of Water
Plastic Shine: From Prosaic Miracle to Retrograde Sublime
The Museum, Its Meaning and Mission
The Forms of Non-Belonging
The Message of Francis
Crimes Without a Scene: Qian Weikang and the New Measurement Group
Why Preserve the Name “Human”?
Empire and Its Double: The Many Pavilions of the Islamic State
Theorizing Deposition: Transitional Stratigraphy, Disruptive Layers, and the Future
Is There Any World to Come?
The Loop
After Nihilism, After Technic: Sketches for a New Philosophical Architecture
Do You See It? Well, It Doesn’t See You!
The Fruitarian Dilemma: A Dialogue about Kissing Ass, Corruption, and Compromise
Theorems of Life (As an Addendum and Clarification on Monism)
The Idle Monologue of an Unconvinced Surveyor
ISIS and the CIA Vie for the Claim to Divinity
On Direct Action: An Address to Cultural Workers
Field Guide to Skirmology: Handbook for the Skirmonaut
Arsenic Dreams
Provincialism Perfected: Global Contemporary Art and Uneven Development
Weapons Grade Pig Work
Botched Enlightenment: A Conversation
Immortality Day
Oh the Animals of Language
ARGUS is: An Almost Cock and Bull Story
Why We Look at Plants, in a Corrupted World
The Making of Americans
Styles and Customs in the 2020s
The Changing of the Gods of Reason: Cecil John Rhodes, Karoo Fracking, and the Decolonizing of the Anthropocene
Child as Material
La Ville Souvenir
On Solar Databases and the Exogenesis of Light
Men of Bronze, Homes of Concrete
Art After the Machines
Nomos and Cosmos
GORILLAZ GRRLZ
Torn Together
Online Digital Artwork and the Status of the “Based-In” Artist
Second Advents: On the Issue of Planning in Contemporary Art
Look Above, the Sky is Falling: Humanity Before and After the End of the World
Shiny
Windjarrameru, The Stealing C*nts
On Deprofessionalizing Surgery
Things Based on Real-Life Events
Thinking About Art Thinking
Construction with Steel and Technology
Apocalypsis, or The Dragon in Her Cave
Turk, Toaster, Task Rabbit
On the Documentary
Cosmic Anxiety: The Russian Case
The Great Silence
The Art of Cooking: A Dialogue Between Julia Child and Craig Claiborne
SUPERCOMMUNITY (editorial)
e-flux conversations is a discussion platform for e-flux readers. Click to start a discussion of the article above.
- Conversations
- Share
- Download PDF